Letters

LETTERS

Cheap Shot?

To paraphrase Brian Ewart, (AGENDA, 2/89), it is in the context of a societal tragedy that some close their minds to viewpoints different than their own. It is, perhaps, an even greater tragedy that a publication promoting itself as "Ann Arbor's Alternative News-monthly" opted to present as a news article what is obviously an editorial.

The lengthy point of view piece spoken of is that published about the Southeastern Michigan Environmental Resource Association, SMERA, and the monthly advertisement SMERA places in AGENDA entitled, "Environmental Letter to the People of Michigan." SMERA takes this opportunity to respond.

First, a definition of SMERA. SMERA is an association of people who are concerned about the condition of the environment that we believe has been created by the inability of the DNR to interact in a meaningful way with businesses, other organizations and the public. SMERA is dedicated to the dissemination of information that will lead to a better environment for all residents of this state.

Second, a statement of what SMERA is not. SMERA is not a front - for industry, for any company or for any individual. SMERA was formed in December, 1988 by a small group of individuals with common concern previously noted. As a result of the size of the group, when the group coalesced, it did so under the assumed name of SMERA. A certificate to that effect was issued by Washtenaw County authorities. Under these circumstances, only the persons originally involved in the formation have the right to use the name.

When SMERA was formed, those involved were interested in expressing their common viewpoint, not in becoming a larger organization. Despite the viewpoint expressed in AGENDA, the mail SMERA has received in response to its monthly "Letters" has been predominantly favorable to its cause. This mail has not come from corporations or business representatives. Most of the correspondance received has contained not only comments of support, but also inquiries about how the writers might participate. Therefore, the members are now considering reformulating the organization as a non-profit membership corporation open to anyone.

Brian Ewart, the author of the piece appearing in the February issue of AGENDA, represents an environmental organization (Tocsin) that appears to share few views with SMERA. Finding no firm factual basis upon which to claim SMERA is a front for any business, Mr. Ewart linked SMERA by implication with pro-nuclear groups. The implication is preposterous. lts publication is a cheap shot.

Adam Paul Banner, Information Officer, SMERA

ANN ARBOR, Ml